Free SAT PrepHowever, C is clearly not required, since the claim must be filed during the pendency of the 2nd application, and the later of 4 months after the 2nd application or 16 months after the first. The application issues as a US patent on December 4, At the oral hearing, pre admission content test study guide , appellant may only rely on evidence that has been previously entered and considered by the primary examiner and present argument that has been relied upon in the brief or reply brief except as permitted by paragraph e 2 of this section. Lots more questions about appeals and PCT, almost nothing on claims. Thus, I think C is the correct answer. That is very good. USPTO is not good at providing good questions, since they made the wrong answers, and they are so obviously wrong. Address Change — for only one of 4 inventors address changes, only they need to submit a new form, but they need to name the other inventors. Either way, there were tons of repeat questions from all the old exams…roughly Our admission staff can't wait to pre admission content test study guide you. Good luck studying, this website is a great resource. The site benefited me before I took the test, so I would like to contribute things I remembered. No real e date. Repeated questions are around Anybody in the DC area taking the patent bar soon? I narrowed down to two choices; 1. Examiner rejects because there 2017 polaris 570 owners torrent no description as to how its made.
Graduate Admission We will help you weigh the excellent options for graduate study at Emerson and understand how specific programs will advance your career or . The Law School Admission Council eases the admission process for law schools and prospective law students. Learn more about becoming an attorney. Patent bar exam study guide. I took the exam yesterday and passed. I’d say a fair 25%% of the questions were straight from previous tests that I had seen while taking the PRG ExamWare tests. This PAX-PN study guide includes PAX-PN practice test questions. Our PAX-PN study guide contains easy-to-read essential summaries that highlight the key areas of the PAX-PN test. Mometrix's PAX-PN test study guide reviews the most important components of the PAX-PN exam. Who Takes the Test? The GRE is taken by a wide range of students who aspire to enroll in graduate courses or business school. The aspiring applicants come from all over the globe, and their general aim is to pursue a master’s degree, doctoral degree, or even an accredited MBA online kukakutemiv.tut-obovsem.info GRE helps in measuring the abilities and skills of .
|Pre admission content test study guide||Firstly, the filing date of the application under examination is irrelevant under the amended form of 35 USC e. A thorough understanding of what traits Fire departments look for in their Firefighter candidates. B Laurel, Abbot, pre admission content test study guide Hardy. It looks as though this project was never completed. I clicked on the end button and did the survey. They will help you prepare for the real thing. C Laurel, Hardy and Burns. I am at chpater right now. USPTO is not good at providing good questions, since they made the wrong answers, and they are so obviously wrong. Removing benefit of Priority — question stated that inventor wanted to extend his patent term by removing the benefit of priority to parent application. Powers of the board to remand -additional requirements that the board can ask the examiner to do. The morning portion of the test was harder than the older exam here to me, may be simply because I am familiar with the test questions here, I thought the afternoon one could be easier, pre admission content test study guide , but there is a lot of more surprises in the afternoon.|
|Leed core concepts guide 2nd||Nilfisk advance hr 2800 operators torrent|
|Pre admission content test study guide||For those of you studying for the exam now, I recommend like everyone else study, study, study ALL the old exams. I had the following repeats: The mathematical skills you have typically acquired in courses up to the beginning of grade There were a couple of questions where I spent maybe a good 10 minutes on, and even then, I had to make an educated guess between two choices. You will have ups and downs like in life, but it is a relatively balanced test, if you keep calm and stay focused, you should pre admission content test study guide fine. Math Practice Test Questions. The applicant re-opens prosecution in front of the examiner. I had about 40 repeats and variations including: I guess they asked the same question three times differently. I took the exam just a few days ago and passed. Perhaps the answer choice is referring to the assignee granting access to someone else and not requesting access for themselves. So, my suggestion would be do add a tab for people who work already in this market, and could make suggestions, pre admission content test study guide . He then files an IA claiming benefit to the provisional on Oct. The optional writing section measures writing skills taught in high school English classes and in entry-level college composition courses. It seems that they have shifted a bit towards testing your capability of searching and finding right stuff in MPEP. But the Inter partes procedure was created several years after the ex parte procedure. On the test itself, there were probably 20 repeats and so the saved time was definitely helpful.|
|CIBSE LIGHTING GUIDE INDUSTRIAL BING||Shallow water lifeguard torrent|
|Pre admission content test study guide||664|
You can have your ACT scores sent to other colleges and scholarship agencies even after you test. ACT Profile is a free, mobile resource to help you learn more about yourself and the college and career paths you want to explore. Engage identifies critical, yet overlooked attitudes and behaviors, at grades , , and college levels, that contribute to future success.
The test is the same everywhere, but instructions for registration, test day, and score access vary by country. Includes Canada and overseas US military bases. This action will open a new window. Do you want to proceed? Preparing for the Test Hone your skills with in-depth preparation guides, tutorials, practice questions and more. ACT Academy Free online learning and test practice to help you get the best score possible on the ACT test, and well on your way to college and career success.
ACT Kaplan Online Prep Live An interactive virtual classroom experience that delivers engaging online live instruction, at an accessible price. Free Study Guide PDF Download a free preparation booklet with test information, complete practice tests with scoring keys, and a writing prompt.
English Practice Test Questions. Your understanding of English, production of writing and knowledge of language skills. Math Practice Test Questions. The mathematical skills you have typically acquired in courses up to the beginning of grade Reading Practice Test Questions. Reading comprehension commonly encountered in first-year college curricula. Science Practice Test Questions. In the afternoon section my computer froze and they had to move me to a new one.
I also want to note that the search function on the MPEP in at the Prometric I was at was lightning fast compared to the pdf version on my own laptop. Finally, as many others have recently noted, I found the second half to be much easier than the 1st.
Just passed the test yesterday. I have lots of questions on appeal. Specifically 3 questions about the BPAI making a new rejection on appeal and different scenarios on what happens when it is sent back down to the examiner. A few on reissue. Japan, Costa Rica, Sweden and two figuring the e date. Also, one on inequitable conduct that I have never come across before. Some repeats that I remember: Just a final thought. My exam seemed to be just as tough as in the morning as it was in the afternoon.
I had all my appeal questions in the afternoon as well as very obscure questions. If I think of any other questions as I forgot some , I will post them later. Now to sell my PLI stuff! Brick Door handle Moon Dust. Had a few crazy ones. As others have mentioned, it is important to rack up on as many known old exam questions as possible. I am reviewing the Bullseye questions.
Also, what are your experiences with the Bullseye questions.. How did you use these questions to study? How useful is it to review your past exam? I took the exam last month and made Wondering if I should review my exam. Thanks in advance for your help. I took my first pbar in Jan and scored 68 with PRG materials only. Then, I found this site and also bought bulleye. Their questions were very helpful a good start and was a quick review, also read their mini MPEP.
I looked up MPEP for every answer choices during my study, so I understand the concept and not just memorizing them. Some of those were variation of the old test so make sure you know the materials.
I had the following repeats: How much study time did you put in? What type of review did you do days before the exam? Hi Sami, For my first test, I put in a lot of time going through PRG dvd lecture and did about questions from their examware. Just passed the exam today a few hours ago. I can not thank the owner of this website enough for getting me prepared. I also made a chart for all the questions during the first 15 minutes when the tutorial is given , and marked the questions that needed look up later.
I had about 10 questions marked in the morning, and about 12 in the afternoon. Some questions that I encountered: Visting attorney in Germany file by fax 6. Australian PCT national stage entered without specifically saying that it is national stage, but the oath indicated priority to only a PCT 8.
By when you can get refund for mistakenly paid large entity fee petition within 3 months, non-extendable I passed the exam yesterday. Thanks to this site I knew what to expect. A mixture of old questions, questions from this site and betas. I studied using Longacre every day for 3 months to get this stuff under my skin. I suggest using the MPEP as much as possible so that you can find your way around it. This was invaluable during the exam when I had to answer tricky questions.
I eventually just made my own outline based off material on mypatentbar, and sat there and read the MPEP chapters that are now heavily tested , , , Had a total of roughly 40 repeats, with 20 coming the first half and 20 coming the 2nd half. About half of those repeats were from the April, October tests, the rest were split between the newer post questions as well as some from the older ones from I honestly think I just got lucky with the number of repeats.
On the other hand, it does show how important it is to know the old exams as well as the questions people have posted like the back of your hand. I used to not understand how people who have taken the test can remember so many questions from it to pass onto future test takers. Having finally done it myself, all I can say is that it will stick to you. Evil e A practitioner files a US provisional on Oct 1, He then files an IA claiming benefit to the provisional on Oct. On March 23, a practitioner files a national app under a claiming the benefit to the international app.
What is the earliest e date of the national app filed under a? The question does NOT mention anything about satisfying fee oath translation requirements of c.
For IA filed before Nov. Yes, e 1 date: If a later-filed U. The other answer choices were the provisional date, the IA filing date, the IA publication date. I actually had this in my outline, but just freaked when I saw this on the test. A facsimile using the certificate of transmission is sent out today, sometime in , and is received today. Which one of these would receive the benefit of the certificate of transmission. Be careful of the wording of the question.
The question says that the fax is sent and received on the same day to mess you up. Making new arguments after oral hearings for the first time, and nothing is written about it in the appeal brief. Submitting arguments after oral hearings that the practitioner had previously made during prosecution. I went with IV only. The IA is filed in Japanese. Everything else about the IA is ok it has a request, designation, spec, claim, drawing.
What will happen now? The USRO will invite him to send in an English translation of the app within a certain amount of time, and if the applicant does so, afford him a filing date as of the date the translation is received. The app has the proper request, designation, spec, claim, drawing, and is in English. Later they find out that a third inventor, Figg, should be added to the IA.
They fail to do so before 20 months. What is in accordance with PTO rules. I think the whole bit about Figg is just a red herring, along with the 20 month deal since that was under the old PCT rules.
Under Filing Date. An international filing date is accorded to the earliest date on which the requirements under PCT Article 11 1 were satisfied. If the requirements under PCT Article 11 1 are not satisfied as of the date of initial receipt of the international application papers, the receiving Office will invite applicant to correct the deficiency within a set time limit. If the application becomes allowed, the application should not be returned to the Board.
Answer is A, they will still get a filing date despite the seemingly negative connotation the answer has. The answer is D! A reissue with an assignee of the full interest which seeks to delete one hostile inventor as well as broaden does not require the signature of the inventor being deleted. Applicant provided specific measurements but the prior art does not. Which date to use for calculation of fee extension?
From the end of the SSP of 3 months. This just goes to show you how old some of the questions in the PTO database are, and how they refuse to discard some of them.
Does any body has any thoughts on question 2 on the post 6? What are the three things can use one signature? Took the exam yesterday and passed. Had only a handful of repeats moondust, tribell, bloc, Japan 45 days in each session.
Lots of obscure questions that I had to look up even had a couple from chapters , and , which are supposedly never tested. PCT and appeals were heavily tested — I would recommend reading through those chapters to really get familiar with them. You really have to know your way around the MPEP in order to pass. Sorry to hear that. I think sometimes it depends on how lucky you are how many repeats you get. Tridell, Moondust, Japan 45 days answer , Bloc, few others.
DP, sorry you got screwed by getting only a few repeats. My suggestion is to focus on getting as high a score as possible on the multistate exam. I have to ask this: What is the fundamental difference between ex parte reexamination and inter partes reexamination? Inter partes reexam allows the 3rd party to participate in the reexam proceedings to a greater extent as compared to ex parte reexam.
For ex parte reexam proceedings, the 3rd party is pretty much on the outside looking in, whereas for inter partes, the 3rd party can be more active in the proceedings. But the Inter partes procedure was created several years after the ex parte procedure. Thus, inter partes is only available for applications filed on or after Nov. First check the filing date of the application. The next hook is how much the 3rd party wants to participate. A noncompliant incorporation by reference statement may be corrected by an amendment.
However, the amendment must not include new matter. Court decision-claim is valid, binding or not, very tricky one? Restriction requirement Toothbrush Best mode Assignee not of record can sign John johns.
Some are not exact questions but testing the same concepts. I found out you can opt out the 1 hr break if you want to. Sean, In response to 86, the last sentence is misleading. You may come in. Also try adding the following after the last sentence: You must be very careful about an AMENDMENT which incorporates by reference because if new matter is introduced, then you run the risk of adversely affecting your priority date. I think I understand now. Why do these things have to be so convoluted.
Several others that escape me right now. My advice is to take the practice tests until you know them very well a bit repetitive, but it works! But be careful— I had a couple of questions that seemed extremely similar to past test questions that were altered in a way that changed the answer.
I had zero PCT questions in the morning, then a slew of them in the afternoon. The terminal disclaimer, to be recorded in the Patent and Trademark Office, must: Since the question is related to a patent with divided interest, I believe only i and iv can sign terminal discliamer for this question. Hi there, I guess I wrote it very fast and if you do not pay attention is confusing. All parties having any portion of the ownership in the patent property must act together as a composite entity in patent matters before the Office.
Here we have 2 assignees and the applicant, all have an undivided part interest. Also just as a note who does NOT have authority to sign a terminal disclaimer in a patent: Thanks to all contributed to this website, I passed the exam two days ago. There were at least 20 questions from Convert a non-provisional to a provisional to preserve a filing date. Most other questions were reported under exam questions and concept.
Here are two topics from a few I could not answer right away: Reasons for allowance MPEP Morning session was a lot harder than the afternoon session. I had only 20 minutes left to review about 10 marked questions. Questions in the afternoon were either repeats of old exam questions or reported recently tested questions. I had an hour left to look up a few of unsure answers. Passed the test this morning! I had a very similar test as Y in the comment above me i.
Morning section was a lot harder—heavy on obscure situations and maybe 5 repeats. I had 2 different questions that addressed the same topic: Which of the following must be in a provisional app?
The only two credible choices were: Another one that stumped me was one that I initially thought was a repeat and it might be one. It involved amendments that could be made at the time or after an appeal brief had been filed. Amendments filed on or after the date of filing a brief pursuant to 37 CFR A cancel claims, where such cancellation does not affect the scope of any other pending claim in the proceeding; or.
Furthermore its a misquote of the MPEP. But none of the other choices suggested canceling claims, so I went with it. Good luck studying, this website is a great resource. Passed on the first try, fortunately I had a lot of repeats as stated above. I was in at 8AM, out by 2PM.
I used headphones provided by Prometric to keep noise out because a lot of people were in the testing center throughout the day. The computers were new and the MPEP interface was reasonable. The answer sheet helped a lot. Thanks Redbull, mypatentbar for the new questions plus old tests, and the patbar. Now to study for the state bar. Can you provide some more info on this question: This was my 2nd try.
This time around, I re-used those materials for the audio lecture, but mainly did prior exams. I was able to recognize a lot of questions pretty fast and that helped out a lot. Options were along the lines of: I am taking the exam soon. Can you provide some more detail on these questions, and what the answer was if you can remember?
Buzzcuts — Similar to the Einstein question from a prior exams. A gets patent on hairgel and accuses B of infringing hairgel patent. B has been selling hairgel before A filed, and B published an ad more than 1 yr of A filing. B wants to participate as much as he can, what can B do? Inventors ABC, B citizenship wrong on oath. How can this be fixed?
Removing benefit of Priority — question stated that inventor wanted to extend his patent term by removing the benefit of priority to parent application. How is this done? MPEP — in reissue, when will statement of lack of deceptive intent in oath be challenged? There were soooo many repeat questions. I also had interference questions which was NOT expected and I think they are beta questions.
Another interesting question I had was when new arguments can be submitted after you file a reply brief and are awaiting a decision by the Board. They try and trick you up, but the only new argument you can submit is if there has been a new Fed case decision since filing your brief- you can use that and explain why it is relevant, that is the ONLY new argument you can make you can either submit in paper form or argue it at a requested oral hearing.
Hi Bobby, Congratulations on your pass. Can you please provide more information on the interesting question about the new argument? However nothing came out as what you said. There is another part somewhere that says pretty much the same thing for written form as opposed to oral hearing. An appeal decided on the briefs without an oral hearing will receive the same consideration by the Board as appeals decided after an oral hearing. If an oral hearing is held, an oral argument may be presented by, or on behalf of, the primary examiner if considered desirable by either the primary examiner or the Board.
A hearing will be held as stated in the notice, and oral argument will ordinarily be limited to twenty minutes for appellant and fifteen minutes for the primary examiner unless otherwise ordered.
At the oral hearing, appellant may only rely on evidence that has been previously entered and considered by the primary examiner and present argument that has been relied upon in the brief or reply brief except as permitted by paragraph e 2 of this section. The primary examiner may only rely on argument and evidence relied upon in an answer or a supplemental answer except as permitted by paragraph e 2 of this section. This site is amazing!! Thanks soo much for putting this all together.
Patent bar courses are outrageously priced and all the material on this site is more than sufficient to pass the bar. I took the exam on Monday, May 18 in Bedford, Texas, and passed! I took the PLI live course in January, and did practice questions they provided for a few months. Then, about a month before the exam, I began doing practice exams from This site was also a huge help in the final weeks, especially the repeat questions. I had several questions on the PCT and e.
A quick word on this: For e know that there is a difference between pre- and post-Nov. The questions that drew my attention were directed to the filing of drawings.
For example, if you file an app on Jan 4 without drawings, but with a complete spec and claims, and the PTO determines you need drawings, what is the filing date? Brick Beck melting point. If I think of more, I will repost.
Best of luck studying. I agree with what folks have said on this site. Do practice problems, especially from the exams. Know the repeat questions fyi, the only reason I finished in time is because I knew the repeats.
Congrats on passing the exam! Do you still have your PLI materials and are you looking at selling those?? I am looking at purchasing a used bar review course. Sorry — also had: If tables are more than 51 pages does it have to be on a CD? The pertinent section of MPEP is Took the exam today third try and passed. I reread the exams the night before and in the morning. I then scanned ALL the questions first to see if any were repeats, and answered them first.
I think this helped. Again, the PM session went quicker than the AM session. I had 45 minutes to look up answers, while in the AM it was 20 min or so. I passed the test today on my first try. I was able to look up perhaps a handful of question on the MPEP, it was not very convenient. Some of the repeats were verbatim, but most had some changes in them.
These are some of what I can remember:. How to make sure company xyz is owner on the patent fee transmittal A couple of fax questions A couple of certificate of mailing questions A couple of USPS Express mail questions Museum Ti ball prior art date is when indexed, I think 2 almost identical questions on new ground of rejection by BPAI 2 almost identical questions about a few claims rejected and a few allowed after appeal, what happens next?
Appeal brief is not filed, what happens appeal ends but the app goes back to examiner. I think after allowance, but not sure App is filed by A and B, but B thinks he should be the sole inventor, what can he do I think file his own app and request interference A tough question on f , mostly look up from What are the invention concepts of f. Several questions on e , a with familiar fact patterns to identify how to overcome the rejections 2 or 3 questions on obviousness hard ones Restriction requirement and how examiner decides on restriction.
What can an assignee not of record sign? I think practitioner can continue prosecution. Claim counting still ! How to correct the address ADS, I think. Hair growth remedy and old shoe polish product claim a method of hair growth. Electric toothbrush claim power source or something like that. A few reexam or reexam-related questions know only patents and printed pubs can be used, also inter-parte after Nov.
What to do you have 30 days to comment on it, after ISA report. Reissue app filed to claim forgotten foreign priority, what is needed? Maintenance fee returned, how to send it back properly and what petition to file? How to cancel claim of foreign priority to increase patent term amend the spec.
My recommendation is to review every exam till Wow that many repeats? Did you see any new questions? I am scheduled to take the test in mid July; what are your tips?
Means or step plus function claims 35 USC 6th paragragh Even after reading the corresponding part in chapter , I am still very confused. Can someone give me some old test exam questions to help me to understand the concept?
CPA practice is applicable for design and not plant and utility applicns only from which date: I am very confused with this one- all the prev tests I have taken inform about the former date while MPEP Please help- I am taking the exam next week. Hope this helps… I am afraid this is hardly the first item where there would appear to be inconsistencies between dates as enumerated in different parts of the MPEP….
Dan, I cant think of any new questions at the top of my head. The test center prevents you from noting down questions. My advise is to go over all the exam question, but delve deep into each answer and understand the possibilities. If you can supplement that with this site, you should be good to go.
I just found something interesting while doing question 19 October 15, , afternoon exam. However the two words are not in the same line. It was broken into two lines. Has anyone seen anything similar? I tried a few other search words where the sentence was staggered in two lines and it does not work unless it is in the same line.
I have downloaded the recent version of MPEP rev. Basic factual inquiries of Graham vs. In this one, only 3 are mentioned of which 1st and 2nd are repeats i. Am I missing something? Also a few qs: Also, are only b , c and d statutory bars? To answer , Thankyou- I got the same question: Inventor A agrees but inventor B disagrees.
PCT- I got all the recently reported new questions. Swedish — a variation- forward to IB may no longer be correct choice. PCT- Q changed but similar fact pattern The following are questions from Oct 03 exams. I am following this sites format except for underlining Q I say Q.
Claim counting — Ans Japan — Ans 45days Action after 2x rejection — 2Q This time I changed my test prep strategy. I spent whatever time I had to study on the past exams until I knew every question. Also used this web site. My test sounds like it easily could have been the same test as Mohammad and Roy. Did you do any exams prior to ? And if you did, would you suggest doing them or not.
Also did many of the repeats have variations from the old exams or what majority were verbatim. Yes, there were a a bunch of questions from the and exams. So I would suggest going back to I know that learning more exams is not fun, but if you already did the and exams, then it will not be as difficult for you to do and because there are some questions from and that were repeated in and So you already did those questions.
Plus you are already familiar with the general concepts so you should have an easier time with the and exams. I wrote down the information of exactly how many repeats were verbatim or variations on scrap paper, but they made me turn everything in before I left. I was not going to risk trying to smuggle it out, especially after passing the test.
So this is just from memory. Many variants were of the type where the question was verbatim but the answer choices were different. That is still an advantage because at least I did not need to waste any time and energy just trying to understand the question, unlike my first time around.
I also suggest knowing the post exam questions from this web site. I think that I had about of these on my test. What an advantage for me the 2nd time around.
The 1st time, I prepared by mainly focusing on what the course taught but did not know the old exams inside and out. Plus I was not aware of this blog. I used the wrong strategy for passing the test. This time around, I had already seen and studied about 80 of my test questions beforehand and instantly knew the answers to most of them.
I got a variation answer choice as I said above. The incorrect choices appeared similar to those in the original. So, you definitely want to look at the explanations in this question to know what is incorrect. I am happy to have stumbled upon this site. When you actually take the patent bar is it the same? Does anyone have the freepatentbar. With a very busy job at a High Tech startup, and a 2-year-old daughter, my time to study has been extremely reduced… So I took about 15 months, from the time I started studying until today… I purchased a used copy of the PLI course, and listened to all the tapes about 10 times each this is no joke, by now I can recite those tapes by memory!!!
After you take the tests, carefully review them at least the questions you get wrong and make very, very sure you understand why you got them wrong….
Good luck to everybody who will take the test, and congratulations on those who have passed it!!! Hey all, I just took the exam and passed!! Am very glad that I passed on the first try esp since I come from a non-law background. I have a Ph. D in molecular and cell biol and post doc in biomed sciences. This site helped me a lot. Basically I worked on home study guide from PLI and took lots of exam from the patware as well as exams from to Work on the exams with MPEP, use acrobat reader 5 version.
I did not get many repeats from old exam in my first session maybe 10 and a few variants. Also some qs that are posted by the prev exam takers. Make sure you know where to look them up in MPEP- many qs have 2 ans which are very close and you cannot tell the right ans till you refer to the MPEP.
I finished both my sessions in the first hour and spent the remaining two hours checking ans from MPEP. So mastering the MPEP in terms of looking it up and also the right combn of knowledge and past exams help to pass!
Good Luck all the exam takers, congrats to all who passed and thank you for this wonderful site. Passed on my first try. I took the PLI home study course. Did all the exams that were on Patware at least 2 times.
Did a few more of the older exams that are not on Patware. And reviewed all the repeat questions pointed out on this site. My biggest problem was using the funky acrobat that they have and the fact that the resolution on the monitors is much lower, so you are stuck scrolling quite a bit.
In the end, know the basic materials that keep coming up in every exam, review the repeats pointed out here, and know how to search the MPEP. Is it a goof course? How much does it cost. I may be in terested in buying it. Is your the home study version one? Congrats on passing the Exam!
Is your PLI material still available for sale? The current material test is the MPEP version 8 rev. Is this what u were tested on? Looking forward to your reply. Know those chpt really well. Other than that there were atleast qs fro and If you have PLI patware, use the customised exam option and take tests on above mentioned chpt- will help you familiarize with these chpts. Also, while taking the exam, minimize the MPEP window with your mouse dragging on the edges- that way you can compare key words directly from the exam.
Also, anyone interested in PLI materials? Hi Newbie… Congrats on passing! I plan to take the exam at the end of summer and would be interested in the used copy of PLI, let me know if you still have it. Sure Jay, Email me at sheelk hotmail. In addition I can give you my notes- from chpt and which you ought to know cold. Anyone know anything about PES system from Colorado?
But is it good? ANyone have any experience with a good course please help. Newbie, Congratulations on your pass! Did you run into the situation that two words that you searched were staggered in two lines?
I am thinking to take the exame in August. I am using the PLI and Bullseye material. My study stratergy is I read the outline of each chapter; then i start working on questions that relate to those chapters Bullseye has a pdf doc with grouped questions by chpater.
I am at chpater right now. Thank you so much. I am just curious about Bullseye materials. Is it any good in term of explaining MPEP? My strategy is to find something to learn and understand the MPEP then take a lot of old exams. It also contains a question bank with most asked questions at prometric. An application includes independent claims 1 and 2. Which of the following, in a reply to a non-final Office Action, provides the proper basis for a rejection under 35 USC 1?
B Applicant amends claim 1 of the originally filed application by adding a limitation that was written in the original disclosure of the application, but the original disclosure does not enable one of ordinary skill in the art to make or use the invention as claimed in amended claim 1.
C Applicant amends and broaden claim 2 by removing a limitation which was written in the original disclosure of the application, and one of ordinary skill in the art is enabled by the original disclosure to make and use the invention as claimed in amended claim 2. The answer said the correct answer is B. C is not correct because the original disclosure enables claim 2. But if we look at C, it removed a limitation which was written in the original disclosure.
Following up my preceding post: Written description and enablement requirement are independent from each other. They can be the basis for a rejection under 35 USC 1 respectively. For the next two months after you are done with your chapterr revisions, concentrate on prev exams in addition to customized exams from PLI software.
Also, I did not encounter the problem of words staggerd in two lines. Anyone aware of good websites to look for jobs in Law Firms? I have come across a few on the net but any inputs will be appreciated. Hi Newbee, Not sure what you are looking for, but http: I think I am mastering the exams from 00 to It seems that I need to change the study material.
Been using omniprep — which has so many holes. Is anyone interested in selling their PLI books and software? Our goal is to produce the highest quality patent bar course to ensure that our students achieve success on their USPTO exam. Because we are confident about the quality of our course, OmniPrep offers the best money back guarantee in the industry. If this is a real complaint we ask the poster to please contact our Administration Department at: How did you study for the exam?
How many hours did you study? I took an online course with omniprep… not good at all. I am expert on searching MPEP… I did about 2 hours 5 times a week for about 5 months… and failed it the first time.
In my opinion, the prep material was not good, and I had no direction on what I need to know for the exam. Then, I studied for two months about hours every day.
This website has a lot of confusing material. It tells you what the new questions where encountered, but many explanations are very confusing and not helpful to prepare for the actual exam. Our mission is to produce the highest quality patent bar course to ensure that our students achieve success on their USPTO exam.
If these are real complaints, or if you have any questions regarding our course, please contact our Administration Department at: I had the same experience just today.
I only missed questions on each of the old exams while I was taking them. I definitely focused on the wrong stuff. So for all you people over-working on the old exams, take notice: Contrary to others, I only had a total of 4 repeaters: NOT worth worrying about repeaters… focus on the info! Other than that, ALL my questions were new.
Omni Learning Corporation, the publisher of OmniPrep Patent Bar Review Course, strongly disagrees with the negative comments about our course posted on this message board. I am sorry to hear that. I am reviewing all old exams twice , reviewing outlines of the PLI course I made and just reviewing wrong questions over and over. Please advise what I should do differently. I am a little surprised you had so little repeats. Everyone else who posted seemed to get up to 60 percent repeats.
It could be that you u got unlucky with a very hard version. Do you happen to remember what sort of appeal and PCT questions you encountered? Were they very obscure?? Often they have changed the question entirely.
Or at the very least moved the answers around. Everything else you can just look up—the search feature, contrary to what a lot of people say, is fairly simple to use. VERY little else re: I spent a good bit of time in , , The thing you definitely need to know is the interaction between the chapters.
Most of the time, your answer comes from 2 different chapters, so you need to know where to go look. I just found that a LOT of my questions were really bizarre. So for next time I will probably look at a lot more of the subtle things in the chapters.
But can you figure out exactly when a claim is broadened, or what happens if you want to do a divisional app in the reissue to split the invention in 2 so that you can have your part all to yourself?
I am going to stop writing now, but let me know if you have more questions… I would be happy to answer them. The tutorial lasts up to 15 min. I had a good The questions were in size font, so plenty large.
A big thank you to all of you who posted here. I took the exam today and passed. More focus is on exams from Winter onwards. If claim missed out in international app. Appeal Questions-what happens to claims if Appeal is withdrawn-no brief is filed.
I guess they asked the same question three times differently. Fill in the blanks, claim status. Powers of the board to remand -additional requirements that the board can ask the examiner to do. Chapter 7 flowchart-references-two questions. If you are given application number not published yet , and you call up FIU whether they will respond to you or not. If attorney is assigned part of patent-whether need permission from LRs.
One Q about Tech. Center Director for deciding issue of restriction requirement. Multiple Questions on Appeal. What happens if you pay issue fee and you receive new art — withdrawal from issue. I took and passed the exam yesterday. I feel that I was well prepared, and it seemed easier than previous exams. The fact patterns were shorter, so it was quicker.
I did not have a ton of repeats, but the questions were not too different from past tests. Tin Foil Airplane — same as has been posted. Potter- same as past exam. No matter how many times I did this question in practice, I screwed it up, so I just picked the same answer. Ti Baseball- Similar to what has been mentioned. I am pretty sure that the correct answer is the day that it is indexed and catalogued. The fact pattern seemed to be slightly different than what has been posted, but it related to a brochure not the ball itself in the museum.
ABCDE- same as past exam, okay to broaden even though original request was to narrow, since broadening occurred on the 2 year date. Japanese nonpublication request- Similar to past exam, I think that they tweaked the answers such that only one was correct this time. Japanese application — In Japanese, transmitted to the IB after payment of the issue fee.
There was a similar choice wrong that said transmit to the Japanese Bureau. Multiplicity — 2 pice Broom Call practitioner, get election, reject all claims, review the ones that were agreed upon verbatim from the MPEP. Assignee not of record — What can he sign? I chose that he could sign a request for status of an application, as anyone can do that.
The other choices were terminal disclaimers, small entity status, amendments. Linking claim- after election, the linking claim is examined with the elected claims verbatim from the MPEP.
But all of the CD choices were wrong, because they were not submitted in duplicate and there was another wrong choice about a magnetic tape or something. Small Entity- Similar to past exam, SE was claimed, but license was sold prior to application.
Must submit the difference and a statement. Maintenance Fee- What to do if it was not recorded. Fraud- Examiner can use knowledge not in the reissue record of a court decision to reject for deceptive intent. Address Change — for only one of 4 inventors address changes, only they need to submit a new form, but they need to name the other inventors.
Death of inventor — A few of them, cant remember exactly, but they were pretty straight forward remember that the employer could not prosecute, because they were not an assignee.
Which is correct question? When stuff is expunged, etc. But the other 4 were not right. Fact pattern supported a d rejection. Not enough info for b. If the examiner can make a d rejection should they also make a a rejection. Just follow the charts in This is an exception right in the MPEP. Found the answer in the MPEP. Court decision- If a court finds a patent not invalid double negative examiner can still find reasons to reject it is not binding.
Appeal — A few, including rehearings, I read the section during the exam. There were also a few new ground of rejection from the board. One on late filing of Brief 4mos, attorney would have to revive a terminated… Claim 1 rejected, claims objected to because of 1, claims okay, examiner can rewrite in independent form or allow applicant to.
Remand from board — same as past exam, even though its not really correct answer was to make examiner consider an affidavit. Chemical Claim — Same as the one referenced on this site. Examiner rejects because there is no description as to how its made. Response is that it was common in the art. There is a whole section on this in the MPEP, had to read it during the exam. Transparent layer adhesive question- Fact pattern was the same, but the choices were all different. I took the exam just a few days ago and passed.
The first time I failed, I thought I could just go in there and pass just knowing the stuff I learned in my Patent Law class. I failed, barely getting more than half right. I failed with a I did only 1 practice test and that definitely cost me.
I followed this review with the 4 practice tests from I did 50 questions a day instead of the , so I could review the test and not be overwhelmed. I scored around the consistently. I reviewed every question to make sure I knew why I got questions right and why I got questions wrong. Then I would skim the Bullseye outline again and look through my notes from the outline.
I was answering a lot faster since I was repeating the tests, so I did questions a day this time and reviewed all the marked questions. By this time, I was hitting the 90s consistently. Then I then went through all the exam questions posted on this site just to cover any new questions I can find.
On the test itself, there were probably 20 repeats and so the saved time was definitely helpful. I failed twice before I finally passed, so if anyone is feeling discouraged, keep going!
Receive the latest news about the ACT, including registration reminders and other helpful information to prepare for college and career success. Free online learning and test practice to help you get the best score possible on the ACT test, and well on your way to college and career success. An interactive virtual classroom experience that delivers engaging online live instruction, at an accessible price.
The only online program designed exclusively by ACT test development professionals, featuring real questions from previous tests. An ACT-authorized prep book, with three practice tests, each with an optional writing test, plus access to hundreds of additional questions online.
Download a free preparation booklet with test information, complete practice tests with scoring keys, and a writing prompt. Choose the right test prep option for you. Starting with ACT Academy and then moving into the premiere test prep option that works best for your learning style. English, mathematics, reading and science. ACT's writing test is optional and will not affect your composite score.
The optional writing section measures writing skills taught in high school English classes and in entry-level college composition courses. Keep calm and know what to expect on test day.
Understand what is expected, acceptable, and prohibited. You can have your ACT scores sent to other colleges and scholarship agencies even after you test. ACT Profile is a free, mobile resource to help you learn more about yourself and the college and career paths you want to explore.
Engage identifies critical, yet overlooked attitudes and behaviors, at grades , , and college levels, that contribute to future success. The test is the same everywhere, but instructions for registration, test day, and score access vary by country. Includes Canada and overseas US military bases. This action will open a new window.
Do you want to proceed? Preparing for the Test Hone your skills with in-depth preparation guides, tutorials, practice questions and more. ACT Academy Free online learning and test practice to help you get the best score possible on the ACT test, and well on your way to college and career success.
ACT Kaplan Online Prep Live An interactive virtual classroom experience that delivers engaging online live instruction, at an accessible price.
Free Study Guide PDF Download a free preparation booklet with test information, complete practice tests with scoring keys, and a writing prompt.
English Practice Test Questions. Your understanding of English, production of writing and knowledge of language skills. Math Practice Test Questions. The mathematical skills you have typically acquired in courses up to the beginning of grade Reading Practice Test Questions. Reading comprehension commonly encountered in first-year college curricula. Science Practice Test Questions. Writing Practice Test Questions.
Test Day Checklist Keep calm and know what to expect on test day. When is Your Score Ready? Learn more about when scores are ready, some within two weeks. ACT Profile ACT Profile is a free, mobile resource to help you learn more about yourself and the college and career paths you want to explore. ACT Engage Engage identifies critical, yet overlooked attitudes and behaviors, at grades , , and college levels, that contribute to future success.